Just Wednesday, February 23, 2011, as a result of my intervention on my Facebook profile, in which I expressed my opinion on Ormus and monatomic elements, an acquaintance of mine was going to label these substances as the biggest mistake and the biggest scam ever perpetrated against unaware humanity.
F.W., so I'll name this person in order to protect his identity, had valid arguments at first to correct my statement. In first instance I stated the following:
A. Jenner :
Often, the Internet communication is not the best way to talk about subjects full of meaning, but if this works for the rest of the world, why some individuals fail to understand how it works and what words means?
Since I can not transfer the whole commentary of F.W., because he erased it misinterpreting my reply, I will summarize this giving the reasons for rebuttal.
F.W. stated that the whole ORMUS matter was in itself a big mistake, produced by a number of individuals who supported David Husdson, as attested to by a number of statements made by him about the virtues particularly amazing of this matter. F.W. presented the text taken from an email received by a person who claimed to have attended David Hudson, in which expose the reason for the mistake. Hudson would have misinterpreted himself the MS analysis peaks referring to C and other key elements, and regarded these as monatomic elements, or as exotic matter.
Assuming that David Hudson was a farmer, not a chemist nor a biochemist, or even a physicist, the application he saw above all was in the agricultural and food industries. I also exclude all that was derived as a result, often enriched by stories and colorful New Age, as alien contact, ark of the covenant, the wisdom of the Egyptians, and so on. I would try in the chemical, and physical structure of matter. Then I would come close to aspects of consciousness and pharmacodynamics of this subtle matter, all this without bias or undue skepticism.
Excluding that exotic matter and therefore the monatomic elements, can not in any way be detected by a simple GC / MS, the entire exposure did not seem sufficiently motivated to substantiate a claim of denial of Ormus. Not only that, but F.W. also stated very candidly, but perhaps with a hint of nice sarcasm, that if I had also deleted his claims, the truth about Ormus would not be changed. The truth? and what truth, if the arguments in rebuttal, are scientifically inadequate, vague and unsupported by data?
To date we have never witnessed an orderly analysis of the problem. Even many articles published by skeptical, they seem to be too elusive to the problem.
Therefore, I was going to respond with the following arguments:
A. Jenner : " I'm sorry, but erase your contribution, Mr.F.W. , put me on the same level of those who tried to silence people who we both know well, a work that hasn't had much success. Instead, I will publish on my blog your stimulating statement and even my response to it (if you want, your name will be obscured and only represented by initials or asterisks).
The fact is that almost 99.9% of the so-called "contemporary alchemy" is a big hoax. The difference of 0.1% is in authors that never published anything and are today well closed in their own labs and far from public places (or at least, prudent and truly innovative).
I will be very direct about the matter "Ormus". I admit that I fully agree with your thoughts, if we both stop to Hudson and his method. The fact is, however, strongly refuted if we come to a fundamental question: is it therefore possible to reverse the spin? and whether that operation is possible, through what system or technology may be possible that?
These should be the main questions. Immediately after, it would be necessary to look a little on the exotic matter that you know that exists and is detectable. You see, Mr. F.W., I spent too much time with people able to measure and validate the existence of exotic matter, so long to avoid assume anything until there is proof to the contrary.
I fully agree with you about the whole affair of Hudson. Frankly, I have always viewed with suspicion everything around him, including people who have attended and have always eaten with him. However, we can not deny that there is some intelligence in his incomplete and imperfect intuition.
The acronym "Ormus", and its development, is for me just a trademark, a kind of keyword on the Internet (the modern Bible...) that today refer to a food supplement. Then, nothing important, there are so many supplements on the market...
But the most important thing is that I had the experimental and tangible evidence, verified many times than has been done for the traditional Ormus, that the state of matter orbitally rearranged is a reality reproducible in the lab.
Even more fascinating is that this state of matter orbitally rearranged is not obtained through a simple chemical reaction or through the protocol Hudson. It is neither solid nor liquid, let alone a gas.
I would say that it looks more like a plasma state, a kind of "luminipherous fire" that does not heats but, in itself, "feeds".
Human understanding is a little far from considering this tool. Yeah, just because it is a tool and not a substance that each of us can swallow.
The biggest problem is how to incorporate this subtle matter into a matrix that allows it to be metabolized, in order to bring the same level of subtlety of our inner states of consciousness. Something that obviously the academic science does not know for the simple reason that it rejects any status of a spiritual nature in man."
Really curious was the reaction of F.W., following my words. He immediately canceled his comment, when I had explicitly stated that it would be preserved and also that it would be posted on my blog, just for the interest that would have raised. These are his words to support the action taken:
F.W. : " I'm sorry, it was not my intention to put you on the same level of those who tried to silence people ... you see, I have deleted my contribution and thanks for your enlightening answer."
it is very interesting. Yet F.W. can read English ... So, I ask: How did him misunderstand my words and my intentions? Form that sentence, it seems that he has read only my opening sentence, ignoring totally that I was agreeing with him in various points. Uhmm..., something suspicious is brewing. Perhaps the Internet is really inadequate as a communication tool about these arguments? Maybe, there is really a form of language to be adopted in social networks, which is outside the normal speech, because when I answered:
"I would have preferred that you keep what is written, it was a very interesting comment. But if this is your choice ..."
The immediate answer was:
I understood (see above) that you adviced me to erase my contribution. Unfortunately another misunderstanding when communicating this way :-("
However, it is wise to gloss over the language dynamics, focusing more on technical aspects. First we begin to consider that the high spin and its relative reverse, as intrinsic characteristic of the m-state elements, belongs only to certain classes of isotopes and usually at a beam energy of 75 MeV or up. All this is often achieved by standard in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy methods that involves tandem accelerators. So I highly doubt that ORMUS currently on the market are derived from these processes.
However, I am open minded enough to take as true the fact that under certain conditions, matter geometrically induced to behave as a living system, can acquire a Consciousness, and then ordered to change some internal states of its nature. Obviously, this is not easily obtained through a chemical reaction involving hydrochloric acid and Dead Sea salt. Nor does it occur with pure metals subjected to dissolution and precipitation of its limes or complex salts.
Unlike mass and charge that enter a dynamic equation as arbitrary parameters, spin reveals itself through the structure of the relativistic quantum equation for fermions such as electrons. Penrose had considered early on that spin might be more fundamental than space-time and invented spinor and twistor algebras for a combinatorial description of spacetime geometry. Bohm and Hiley generalized the twistor idea to Clifford algebra as a possible basis for describing Bohm’s implicit order. Recently various spin foams have been formulated as extensions to Penrose’s spin networks for the purpose of constructing a consistent theory of quantum gravity.
We now have the keys of this phenomenon and we can manage it, so having found the right receptacle to host it, which is represented by the state in which H behaves polar and in which He manifests all its power suit.